Thursday, April 1, 2021

Acts 15

 Good morning and welcome back winter!!

The view from our living room window this morning!

The chapter begins with controversy! Over circumcision= again! These Jewish Christians (often called “Judaizers”) came to the congregation in Antioch and taught that Gentiles may become Christians, but only after first becoming Jews, and submitting to all Jewish rituals, including circumcision. It was very difficult for some Jewish Christians to accept that Gentiles could be brought into the church as equal members without first coming through the Law of Moses. How do we feel when someone seems to "skip past" the regulations to get something we have waited for a long time?

Paul and Barnabas respond back (vv 2-4) to this false doctrine. Circumcision and belief in the Mosaic laws were not critical for acceptance by God. Controversy continues, so they go to Jerusalem to talk with the "bosses" to see what they think! They couldn’t just agree to disagree on this issue, because it was at the core of what meant to be a follower of Jesus. 

As Paul and Barnabas went to Jerusalem, they found plenty of other Christians who rejoiced at what God did among the Gentiles. This was in contrast to the certain men from Judea. However, even with all the joy and happiness at their arrival, many of Pharisees who had converted were in the group who opposed Paul and Barnabas (v 5). Pharisees were well known for their high regard for the law, and their desire to obey the law in the smallest details. The Pharisees were experts in the law. If the Pharisees believed anything, they believed one could be justified before God by keeping the law. For a Pharisee to really be a Christian, it would take more than an acknowledgment that Jesus was Messiah; he would have to forsake his attempts to justify himself by the keeping of the law and accept the work of Jesus as the basis of his justification. Remember- Paul was a Pharisee at one time! The Pharisees were not against the Gentiles coming to Jesus, they just taught Gentiles are free to come to Jesus. We welcome them and want them to come to Jesus. But they have to come through the Law of Moses in order to come to Jesus. Paul and Barnabas, among others, have allowed Gentiles to come to Jesus without first coming through the Law of Moses. Life is about jumping through hoops- this seems like a hoop to jump through!

The discussion became too much of an argument and it was central to the teachings, so a council was called together (v 6). The question raised by the Jerusalem council was huge: "Are Christians made right with God by faith alone, or by a combination of faith and obedience of the Law of Moses? Is the work of Jesus by itself enough to save the one who trusts in Jesus, or must we add our work to Jesus’ work in order to be made right with God?" That controversy is still a debate in some denominations now! Faith? Works? Both? Either?

Peter stands up to address the crowd (v 7- 11). Peter made an important observation. It came straight from his vision of the clean and unclean animals, from which God taught him this principle: God has shown to me that I should not call any man common or unclean. Peter showed how the heart is purified: by faith, not by keeping of the law. If they were purified by faith, then there was no need to be purified by submitting to ceremonies found in the Law of Moses. Christians are not only saved by faith; they are also purified by faith. Peter concluded with the observation that it is through grace that all are saved – both Jew and Gentile – and not by obedience to the law. If we are made right with God by grace, then we are not saved by grace and law-keeping. So, what makes us right by God- faith or works?

Barnabas and Paul confirmed Peter’s previous point (v 12). Essentially they said, “God has accepted the Gentiles, should not we as well?”

James (author of the Epistle of James, brother of Jesus and Jude), speaks to the issue (v 13), supporting what Peter and Paul had said. In my translation, he uses the name "Simon" (v 14)-- this is the Hebrew name for Peter- just so you know it isn't a new guy! James quotes from Amos where the prophet outlines God call to the Gentiles and the fall of the tabernacle (reference to the fall of Judaism in that they rejected Jesus as Messiah).Now God wanted to rebuild that work, focusing on a church made up of both Jew and Gentile. James ends this small part (vv 19-21) with, "Just leave them alone! We have things other than circumcision to worry about!" Gentile Christians had the “right” to eat meat sacrificed to idols, to continue their marriage practices, and to eat food without a kosher bleeding, because these were aspects of the Mosaic Law they definitely were not under. However, they were encouraged to law down their rights in these matters as a display of love to their Jewish brethren. James was looking at a Law of Love rather than a Law of Moses with these suggestions. 

The Jerusalem council wisely sent two members of its own community (probably Jewish Christians themselves) with Paul and Barnabas back to Antioch, the place where the whole dispute arose (v 22). They sent a decree from the Jerusalem Council. The letter gives the express decision of the Jerusalem council, that Gentiles should consider themselves under no obligation to the rituals of Judaism, except the sensitivity which love demands, so as to preserve the fellowship of Jewish and Gentile believers. This letter was written specifically to these churches where Jews and Gentiles mixed together with the potential of tension and conflict. It was not addressed to every Gentile congregation.

The Jerusalem Council was the first organized meeting to hammer out church doctrine. It is unique among the in that it is considered by theologians to be a prototype and forerunner of the later ecumenical councils and a key part of Christian ethics. The council decided that Gentile converts to Christianity were not obligated to keep most of the fasts, and other specific rituals, including the rules concerning circumcision. The Council did, however, retain the prohibitions on eating blood, meat containing blood, and meat of animals that were strangled, and on sexual impurity and idolatry, sometimes referred to as the Apostolic Decree or Jerusalem Quadrilateral.

The group gets to Antioch and are joyfully received (v 30-31). Try to imagine how the Gentile Christians felt, wondering how the decision might come forth. Would the council in Jerusalem decide that they really were not saved after all because they had not submitted to circumcision and the Law of Moses? The principle of grace had been preserved! They heard that they were saved and right with God after all (v 31). Work continuing the church in Antioch continues!

Paul and Barnabas discuss about going to the various congregations that they started for check-ins to make sure they were progressing well (v 36). This shows Paul had a real pastor’s heart. He was not content to merely plant churches without seeing them carefully nurtured and growing in the faith. John Mark had previously left the missionary party under what seemed to be less than honorable circumstances (Acts 13:13). This probably made Paul unwilling to trust him on future endeavors. Luke did not give us a clue as to who was right and who was wrong in the dispute between Paul and Barnabas. But it is never good when personal disputes flare up among those serving in the ministry. Tensions in ministry happen...and when tensions happen, ministry for both parties struggle. Any evidence of these struggles in your church? Barnabas takes John Mark (they are cousins, so this may have factored into the decision). Paul (accompanied by Silas) and Barnabas (accompanied by Mark) split, each going out to different fields of ministry (vv 40- 41).

The journey of Paul continues in the next set of chapters. We do't hear much of Barnabas for a while. 


Have a great day...enjoy the readings!


Reminder- tonight is the Maundy Thursday worship at Little Meadows (7PM). All are welcome. We will be on FB Live beginning at 7PM.

Shalom+
Pastor Paul


8 comments:

  1. Oh my! What a joke mother nature has played on us! This was an interesting chapter. It shows that it is not unique for people of the same belief/faith to differ on what that faith/belief means. Even those who knew and lived at the time of Jesus could not agree. It is no wonder that we do not. And even when Paul and Barnabas (both who had intimate knowledge of Jesus) said - no, following Judaic law was not necessary to become a Christian - others did not believe and they were told to go back to (as you said, Pastor) the "bosses" But even when they did go back, there was MORE discussion - even they could not agree. Looks like the division in denominations started way back then! Remembering that Paul was a Pharisee - and a very strict one - it is remarkable that Jesus chose him to be His "vessel". If Paul, who was not only a Pharisee but a Roman citizen AND raised in the knowledge of what it meant to be a Pharisee, can change his thinking so drastically - hmmmmm - can we with today's issues? Can I with my own? BTW, several statements do say "us and THEM" Another similarity to today's issues in the church! It must have been very difficult for the converted Jews to give up everything EVERYTHING they were raised on and completely change their thinking. It is easier for us because we do not have religion "law" that we need to live by everyday . The Jews were Jewish 24/7. They practiced their faith in their homes, with each other, how they raised their children, their marriages, their worship, what they ate, how they dressed - everything! It would be impossible to have a Jewish person marry someone outside their faith and survive. But we think nothing of Protestants and Catholics marrying, or Catholics and Jewish people of today marrying. I totally understand why the Judaizers thought and acted as they did. From today's perspective, I don't agree with it - but I DEFINITELY understand. And although we don't have the 600+ laws of the Jewish faith, we do have the 10 commandments and the 2 commandments of Jesus. So that tells me works - or how we live - is important. So faith or works? I believe both! All the disciples preached the Good News. So to me that means faith - they had it and wanted to give that same faith to others. And in most miracles performed - even by Jesus - it is said "By your faith" It doesn't say - you are a very good person so I will heal/save you. However, we do have the commandments and instructions from Jesus in Matthew 25 that tell us how we are to live our lives and how we are to treat others - so that, to me, is works. So my thought is definitely both. - faith and works. Peter says in vs. 10 (in my translation) "....to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?" Something Paul repeats in his letter to the Galatians. In my thinking, I think Peter is saying - how can we ask more of them then we ourselves do. Again, relating to today's issues. Are we asking others to be perfect to be a Christian (or come to our church) when all of us are so far from perfect - or determining what WE think is a sin when Paul's vision clearly tells us "what God has cleansed, that call not thou common". WOW - another example of the faith and strength of the apostles - (especially Paul and Barnabas) wanting to go BACK to the places where they were threatened and even Paul stoned to check on how things were going. Amazing. It's sad that Paul and Barnabas part - although they "hook up' again later and Paul even begins to admire Mark John. But at least they continued their work!! (And I kind of agree with Paul's thinking - smile) Acts to me is almost the Cliff notes" about live after Jesus. Hebrews touches on the different covenants - but here it is explained much better! Stay warm everyone!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is interesting that the tensions from the early church seem to infiltrate the denominations today...where does faith come from, how do we obtain salvation, what rules do we need to follow. Will we ever figure it out?
      We do need to look at the Jews that have followed rules and regulations for their entire history- and then to change- not easy to do! Same for us discussing changes in our denominational practices.
      Very good thoughts Donna!

      Delete
  2. Oh the poor feet from all that going back and forth from one city to another city and from one country to another country. Time is not really mentioned as to how long it took going from one place to another.
    The decision was as to whether the Gentiles had to follow the laws and be circumcised was made by both sides presenting their ideas and it was decided by the powers that be what the answer would be. Much as a court of law now by the prosecution and defense presenting sides during a trial.
    Even with the Word spreading etc it still amazes me how there is not a lot of mention of women being more than beneath the feet much as slaves or servants Did they not feel that women could have salvation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yah, the walking must have been so tough! This current first missionary journey of Paul's was about 12 to 18 months! Can you imagine!?
      Women were not too highly regarded- especially by Paul. We will see that in some of his epistles later. We do meet some women that were integral to the growth of churches. In the Jewish faith, they were the primary teachers for the children though.
      Good comments Clara!

      Delete
  3. It does seem that the counsel does give the Gentiles an easier way to live than they could have had. Some people might feel that this isn’t fair! No one ever gave them a break, so why would they help someone else. Others might just be glad for the Gentiles and feel that fostering their faith is the most important thing. It’s amazing how many different ways there are to look at things.
    Faith or works? I say both but the most important is faith. Faith and being close to God makes a person want to do good works. I think faith has a lot to do with being steadfast in belief in God over time. Hopefully one grows in their spiritual life over that time.
    On this weekend when we celebrate our most holy time I’m also thinking of all the people who steadfastly spread the word; Stephen who was stoned, Paul and others imprisoned, those who spent their lives, then and now, helping and teaching others about the Good News. Peace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes- it isn't fair! Is it?! We say that often when someone gets a "free pass" that we had to fight for! That's probably how the Jews felt.
      The faith/works debate is interesting! We see it come up in Timothy's epistle later. And it was one of the dividing points in the Reformation!
      One of the comments I made in my worship last night was the Christian commemoration of the Last Supper. It has happened for 2000 years- and we continue that tradition. If it wasn't for the people that took a chance those thousands of year ago- where would we be?
      Good comments Cathy! Thanks!

      Delete
  4. Here we are talking about circumcision again. This time, it appears that the argument is settled by Peter who says: "...it is through grace that all are saved..." James then adds: "Just leave them alone! We have things other than circumcision to worry about!" This seems to me to be a reasonable settlement of the dispute. I remember in previous chapters (not Acts, but well before) where the Law was superseded by Christ. Why shouldn't that be the case here?

    Once again, it is worth noting that this is the first time that Jews and Gentiles are brought together. Gentiles can join the Jewish congregation, but only if they follow the rules, Thus, the argument in the above paragraph. I hope that this noise about circumcision is buried as I don't want to see it again (as if I have any say about it).

    The other people's comments all hit the nail on the head. It makes me glad that I am a dumb engineer and not a lawyer.

    It was in the low 70s here in the Wild West, Not a snow flake in sight. It is supposed to stay warm right through the weekend. Unfortunately, we will not be able to make the Sunrise Service on Sunday. Have a blessed Easter everybody. We had a fill in rector when I was young. On Easter Sunday, has would say (several times throughout the service): "He is risen," To which the response was: "He is risen, indeed."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good observation. I like James' comment- just forget about that part- we have other things to worry about! And the circumcision thing comes up often! It is a debate that continues for most of the early growth of the church!
    We miss you and Rhea in worship! Hope you are finding a good place to be!
    Peace!

    ReplyDelete

A Final Post

 Good morning. We did it! The entire New Testament in a year. that is quite a feat! Thank you all for your dedication and work. It wasn'...